Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 334 SW2D 254 - Pasley v. Ropp

Pasley v. Ropp’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
3
states following
October 1982
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 1982

2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

40196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Birmingham v. Rice Bros. · 236 Mo. App. 1217 - Blackwell v. Laird and Laird · Eureka Springs Sales Co. v. Ward · Walker v. Caviness · Oliver v. Eureka Springs Sales Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The mere fact that defendants were acting as auctioneers is not of itself notice that they were not selling their own goods, and they must be deemed to have been vendors, and responsible as such for title, unless they disclosed at the time the name of the principal.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.