Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 334 S.W.2d 394 - Carson v. Oxenhandler

Carson v. Oxenhandler’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
February 2013
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently February 2013

2 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

50196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hopping v. Council of City of Richmond · 36 Cal. 2d 125 - Simpson v. Hite · 35 Cal. 2d 550 - Housing Authority v. Superior Court · Mumpower v. Housing Authority · 38 Cal. 2d 853 - Housing Authority v. City of Los Angeles

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““No ordinance shall be submitted to the voters by initiative petition unless the subject thereof is within the legislative power granted to charter counties by the Constitution. 2 In passing on the sufficiency of an initiative petition the Board of Election Commissioners shall refuse to submit any proposed ordinance to the voters if unlawful or unconstitutional.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “When the ordinances or charter provisions are or become in conflict with prior or subsequent state statutes, such ordinances or charter provisions are or become, void, and must yield to the higher law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The powers granted a municipality must be exercised in a manner not contrary to the public policy of the state and any provisions in conflict with prior or subsequent state statutes must yield.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.