Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 334 SW3D 776 - State v. Robinson

State v. Robinson’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco))

Relationships

Relies on State v. Kelly · Amador v. State · Pham v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “At a hearing on a motion to suppress blood evidence, once the defendant established that he was arrested for driving while intoxicated without a warrant, does the burden of proof shift to the State to prove that the blood draw was taken in accordance with statutory requirements?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A] defendant who moves for suppression under Article 38,23 due to the violation of a ' statute has the burden of producing evidence of a statutory violation.” State v. Robinson, 334 S.W.3d 776, 777 (Tex.Crim.App.2011),”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[T]he State stipulated to the warrantless arrest, thereby relieving appellee from the burden of rebutting the presumption of proper police conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.