¶2 Wayland Morrow appeals from the trial court’s judgment finding him guilty of murder in the second degree and armed criminal action after a jury trial. Wayland Morrow claims that: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal on both counts because the State’s evidence was insufficient to find beyond a reasonable doubt that Wayland Morrow acted in concert with Robert Morrow to cause the death of Sheldon Haynes; and (2) the trial court erred and abused its discretion in denying Wayland Morrow’s objection to inadmissible hearsay statements made by Robert Morrow and to the State’s comments on the same in closing argument. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).
334 S.W.3d 925
State v. Morrow
Decided March 29, 2011
Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2011-03-29
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 2014
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2011-03-29
View the full empirical analysis of this case →