Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 334 U.S. 100 - United States v. Griffith

United States v. Griffith’s Empirical Analysis

334 U.S. 100 · 1948

Citation profile

1,437
cited by 1,437 later decisions
72
cited 72 times by the Supreme Court
8
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

699 federal appellate · 165 district · 27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,437 later decisions (72 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2025 · most notably Pullman-Standard v. Swint (1982), United States v. Grinnell Corp. (1966)

699 federal appellate · 165 district · 27 state decisions

3380194819501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 29

Relies on Standard Oil Company of New Jersey v. United States · American Tobacco Co. v. United States · United States v. Swift & Co. · Swift Company v. United States · International Salt Co. v. United States

Cited together with United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. · Times-Picayune Pub Co v. United States · American Tobacco Co. v. United States · United States v. Grinnell Corp. · International Salt Co. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,437 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the use of monopoly power, however lawfully acquired, to foreclose competition, to gain a competitive advantage, or to destroy a competitor, is unlawful.”
    51 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “any part of the trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “1. Every contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States, or with foreign nations, is declared to be illegal * * *”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.