Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 334 U.S. 258 - United States v. United States District Court for the Southern District of New York

United States v. United States District Court for the Southern District of New York’s Empirical Analysis

334 U.S. 258 · 1948

Citation profile

193
cited by 193 later decisions
14
cited 14 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
September 2020
most recently cited

128 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 193 later decisions (14 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2020 · most notably Brown Shoe Co. v. United States (1962), Will v. United States (1967)

128 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

500194819501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Second Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on William Marbury v. James Madison · McClellan v. Carland · United States v. Aluminum Co. of America · Ex parte United States · Fairmont Creamery Co v. State of Minnesota

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 193 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “courts have not hesitated to issue writs of mandamus when it appeared to be necessary to enforce the judgment of the appellate court [citation omitted]. Where a lower court has failed to comply with a mandate of a reviewing court, compliance with such mandate may be compelled by writ of mandamus.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The Supreme Court, the circuit courts of appeal, and the district courts shall have power to issue all writs * * * necessary for the exercise of their respective jurisdictions, and agreeable to the usages and principles of law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “extends to support an ultimate power of review, though it not be immediately and directly involved.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.