State v. St. Martin’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
June 2019
most recently cited
20 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Franks v. Delaware · Payton v. New York · United States v. Matlock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]f sufficient untainted evidence was presented in the warrant affidavit to establish probable cause, the warrant was nevertheless valid.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“'may make the usual inferences reasonable persons would draw from the facts presented.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[W]here a search warrant [is] issued based on both tainted and untainted evidence, [a reviewing court may] independently 'determine that the [untainted evidence is] sufficient to support a finding of probable cause to issue the search warrant.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.