Marvel v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
335 F.2d 101 · 1964
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2312 · 18 U.S.C. § 5010
Relies on Von Moltke v. Gillies · Jones v. Cunningham · Kercheval v. United States · Carter v. United States · Pilkington v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Appellant’s contention was ruled adverse to him by this Court in Cunningham v. United States * “We find nothing in Jones v. Cunningham, 371 U.S. 236 , 83 S.Ct. 373 , 9 L.Ed.2d 285 , that militates against that ruling.” “We have chosen to place our affirmance upon the merits of the motion * * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.