Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 335 F.2d 103 - The Western Automatic Machine Screw Co. v. International Union

The Western Automatic Machine Screw Co. v. International Union’s Empirical Analysis

335 F.2d 103 · 1964

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
4
states following
October 2009
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently October 2009

14 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions

13019641970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala. · John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Livingston · Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co. · Drews v. Maryland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"It would be a curious rule which required that intertwined issues of `substance' and `procedure' growing out of a single dispute and raising the same questions on the same facts had to be carved up between two different forums, one deciding after the other. Neither logic nor considerations of policy compel such a result. "Once it is determined, as we have, that the parties are obligated to submit the subject matter of a dispute to arbitration, `procedural' questions which grow out of the dispute and bear on its final disposition should be left to the arbitrator." (376 U. S., p. 557.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.