Edwin A. Walker v. Van H. Savell and the Associated Press’s Empirical Analysis
335 F.2d 536 · 1964
Citation profile
53 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 99 later decisions — most recently June 1998 · most notably Time, Inc. v. Manning (1966), Jones v. Petty-Ray Geophysical, Geosource, Inc. (1992)
53 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · New York Times Co. v. Sullivan · Hanson v. Denckla · McGee v. International Life Insurance · Pennoyer v. Neff
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 99 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it was proper for the trial court to examine into this question immediately and not subject the defendant, so protesting, to a further hearing on the motion to remand and possibly to a further hearing in a state court where it would then have to raise once again the question of personal jurisdiction. Once appellee lodged in the district court its challenge to the jurisdiction in personam, it was entirely appropriate for that court to inquire into, and resolve, that issue.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“because of the inherent danger or threat to the free exercise of the right of freedom of the press if jurisdiction in every state can be inferred from minimal contacts. Cf. Sullivan v. New York Times, 376 U.S. 254 , 84 S.Ct. 710, 11 L.Ed.2d 686.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“* * * there is no suggestion in this Court's decision in Mississippi Wood Preserving [Co. v. Rothschild, 5 Cir., 201 F.2d 233 ] that the broadened scope of International Shoe had been adopted by the State court as the Mississippi standard.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.