Frank Edward Sepulveda v. The State of Colorado’s Empirical Analysis
335 F.2d 581 · 1964
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
April 1973
most recently cited
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Goss v. Illinois · Hurley v. Lindsay · Savini v. Sheriff of Nassau County
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A prisoner in custody under sentence and claiming a right to be released on the ground that such sentence was imposed in violation of the constitution or laws of Colorado or of the United States, * * * may file a motion at any time in the court which imposed such sentence to vacate, set aside or correct it. * * * If the court finds * * * that the sentence imposed was illegal, * * * or that there was a violation of the prisoner's constitutional rights of a sort not effectively subject to review on writ of error * * * the court shall vacate and set aside the judgment, and shall discharge the prisoner or resentence him or grant a new trial as may appear appropriate. * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ruark v. Tinsley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.