Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 335 F.2d 734 - Petschek v. United States

Petschek v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

335 F.2d 734 · 1964

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
November 2007
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2007

10 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

8019641970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 162 · 26 U.S.C. § 212 · 26 U.S.C. § 265

Relies on Bingham's Trust v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue · Trent v. Commissioner · Towanda Textiles, Inc. v. United States · Hawaiian Trust Co. v. United States · Bowers v. Lumpkin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]f the distinction seems fragile, that is not unusual in cases near a frontier, with large hinterlands on either side”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “The drawing of this line has not been easy, as is demonstrated by the many cases cited in 4 Mertens, Law of Federal Income Taxation, §§ 25A.14, 25A.15 and 25A.16 (1960 ed.), and in the discussion of the corresponding problem under the business expense section, see ibid. §§ 25.20, 25.24, 25.25, 25.26 * * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “conservation or maintenance of property held for the production of income”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.