Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 335 F.2d 828 - Foster v. Udall

Foster v. Udall’s Empirical Analysis

335 F.2d 828 · 1964

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
3
states following
January 2014
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently January 2014

7 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

60196419701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As Professor Williston has said, there is nothing that can be regarded as an offer which is not communicated.” Foster v. Udall, 10 Cir., 335 F.2d 828, 831 (1964).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the service agreement contemplated only prefiling services, not an agency with regard to the offer, and these did not come within the regulations”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “only on the basis of the regulations in effect at the times material.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.