Deravin III v. Kerik’s Empirical Analysis
335 F.3d 195 · 2003
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 25 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 179 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably Jute v. Hamilton Sundstrand Corp. (2005), Littlejohn v. City of New York (2015)
23 federal appellate · 25 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Robinson v. Shell Oil Co. · Saint Francis College v. Al-Khazraji · United States v. Gonzales · Fertel-Rust v. Milwaukee Police Department · Butts v. City of New York Department of Housing Preservation & Development
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 179 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“factual allegations made in the [EEOC] charge itself, describing the discrimination conduct about which a plaintiff is grieving,”
12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a claim alleging retaliation by an employer against an employee for filing an EEOC charge;” and (2) "a claim where the plaintiff alleges further incidents of discrimination carried out in precisely the same manner alleged in the EEOC charge.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“because racial categories may overlap significantly with nationality or ethnicity, 'the line between discrimination on account of race and discrimination on account of [other prohibited bases] may be so thin as to be indiscernible,' or at least sufficiently blurred so that courts may infer that both types of discrimination would fall within the reasonable scope of [an] EEOC investigation for exhaustion purposes.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.