Poole v. Goodno’s Empirical Analysis
335 F.3d 705 · 2003
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Williams v. Taylor · Addington v. Texas · Kansas v. Hendricks · Curtis v. Loether · McKeiver v. Pennsylvania
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“in a decision that [is] contrary to, or involv[es] an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hall v. Luebbers“in a decision that [is] based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hall v. Luebbers
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.