United States v. Warren’s Empirical Analysis
335 F.3d 76 · 2003
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently May 2021
6 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Bousley v. United States · Custis v. United States · Parke v. Raley · United States v. Simmons
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] supervised release revocation proceeding is not the proper forum in which to attack the conviction giving rise to the revocation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]he validity of [the defendant's] sentence could not properly be raised in the supervised release revocation proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“various substantive and procedural limitations as the legal and temporal distance from the trial or guilty plea increases.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.