Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 335 F.3d 790 - Back v. Danka Corp.

Back v. Danka Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

335 F.3d 790 · 2003

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
May 2013
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Conley v. Pitney Bowes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “enables an employer, or its plan, to obtain full information about a claim for benefits, to compile an adequate record, and to make a reasoned decision. The process is of substantial benefit to reviewing courts, because it gives them a factual predicate upon which to proceed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.