335 F. Supp. 2d 1 - Broudy v. Mather’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 38 U.S.C. § 511
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Christopher Former Secretary of State et al. v. Harbury · Firestone v. K Firestone · Shear v. National Rifle Ass'n of America · Jennifer K. Harbury, v. John M. Deutch, et al.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“under a law that affects the provision of benefits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Broudy v. Mather
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.