Baughns v. the State’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
January 2020
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Taylor v. State · State v. Chulpayev · Brown v. State · Roberts v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[E]vidence is intrinsic to the charged offense, and thus does not fall within [OCGA § 24-4-]404 (b)’s ambit, if it (1) arose out of the same transaction or series of transactions as the charged offense; (2) is necessary to complete the story of the crime; or (3) is inextricably intertwined with the evidence regarding the charged offense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“committed in a similar way, within a two-week period ... in the same area ... [that] included overlapping participants”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Johnson v. State“framed ... in terms of what [the investigator] wanted to be able to tell the judge,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Price v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.