Johnson v. the State’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · von Thomas v. State · McKibbins v. State · 169 Ga. App. 444 - King v. State · 277 Ga. App. 174 - Hodges v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]s to his conviction for possession of cocaine under OCGA § 16-13-30 (a), following the explicit and plain terms of OCGA § 17-10-7 (b.1), [the appellant] could not be sentenced as a recidivist under OCGA § 17-10-7 (c) because one of the three prior felony convictions used in aggravation was also a conviction under OCGA § 16-13-30 (a).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“entirely on circumstantial evidence, the law requires that the proved facts shall not only be consistent with the hypothesis of guilt, but shall exclude every other reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[s]ubsections (a) and (c) of this Code section shall not apply to a second or any subsequent conviction for any violation of subsection (a), paragraph (1) of subsection (i), or subsection (j) of Code Section 16-13-30.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.