Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 335 GAAPP 835 - Cone v. Dickenson

Cone v. Dickenson’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
November 2017
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 235 Ga. App. 444 - Clark v. Perino · 147 Ga. App. 695 - Cross v. Cook · 275 Ga. App. 728 - DeRossett Enterprises, Inc. v. General Electric Capital Corp. · Torres v. Elkin · 295 Ga. App. 851 - Anderson v. Benton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We apply a de novo standard of review to a trial court's order on a motion to enforce a settlement agreement. ... The issues raised are analogous to those in a motion for summary judgment. The opposing party should be given the benefit of all reasonable doubt, and the court should construe the evidence and all inferences and conclusions therefrom most favorably toward the party opposing the motion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.