Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 335 GAAPP 862 - Ferguson v. the State

Ferguson v. the State’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Kelly · Robinson v. State · Rankin v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]here the State can show that the evidence does not permit it to allege a specific date on which the offense occurred, the State is permitted to allege that the crime occurred between two particular dates. In such a situation, though, the range of dates alleged in the indictment should not be unreasonably broad.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[W]e will reverse the trial court only if the instructional error was not affirmatively waived, was obvious beyond reasonable dispute, likely affected the outcome of the proceedings, and seriously affected the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[a]ny sexually explicit conduct or performance involving sexually explicit conduct for which anything of value is directly or indirectly given, promised to, or received by any person, which conduct is ... induced or obtained from a person under the age of 18 years[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.