Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 335 Ill. App. 418 - Smith v. Ballas

335 Ill. App. 418 - Smith v. Ballas’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
5
states following
November 2010
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently November 2010

22 state decisions

6019481950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on U. S. Industrial Alcohol Co. v. Nudelman · The People v. Jerry · In Re the Liquor Locations

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is common knowledge that loud and profane language, as well as the alcoholic release of conduct inhibitions, are more apt to be associated with taverns than other businesses. When children are in class rooms within the school building, the effect of a nearby tavern is negligible; it is when they are at play on the grounds, unsupervised, that the undesirable influences of a tavern might operate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““127. Retail sales near churches, schools, etc.] § 8. No license shall be issued for the sale at retail of any alcoholic liquor within 100 feet of any church, school, hospital, home for aged or indigent persons or for veterans, their wives or children or any military or naval station; * * (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1971, ch. 43, sec. 127.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.