335 Ill. App. 3d 809 - Doe v. Chand’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently May 2022
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 22 Ill. 2d 73 - Knierim v. Izzo · 163 Ill. 2d 33 - Martin v. Heinold Commodities, Inc. · 177 Ill. 2d 166 - Schwartz v. Cortelloni · LaSalle National Bank v. County of Lake · 311 Ill. App. 3d 7 - Seef v. Ingalls Memorial Hospital
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“intentionally or recklessly violates a provision of this Act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“medical bills, lost wages, or other out-of-pocket expenses”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“I concur in all other aspects of the majority opinion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.