¶1Exceptions overruled. The defendant excepted to the denial of her. motion for a directed verdict and to the admission of certain medical evidence. The action was to recover for personal injuries incurred on January 28, 1951, in Foxboro caused by the alleged gross negligence of the defendant in operating an automobile in which the plaintiff was riding as a guest. There was evidence of persistence in a negligent course of conduct over an appreciable period of time culminating in an accident sufficient under our decisions to warrant a finding for the'plaintiff. See Dombrowski v. Gedman, 299 Mass. 87; O’Neill v. McDonald, 301 Mass. 256, 259; McGaffigan v. Kennedy, 302 Mass. 12, 14-15. There was no error in finding the attending physician of the plaintiff, who was a general practitioner, qualified to give an opinion that the accident was a contributing cause of the plaintiff’s tuberculosis which subsequently developed and in allowing his testimony to this effect to stand. See Hardiman v. Brown, 162 Mass. 585, 587.
335 Mass. 760
Nevanranta v. Koski
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided November 29, 1956
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · decided 1956-11-29
Relies on McGaffigan v. Kennedy · Hardiman v. Brown · Dombrowski v. Gedman
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1956-11-29
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 1984
1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →