Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 335 Mo. 1209 - Strong v. Crancer

Strong v. Crancer’s Empirical Analysis

1934

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
June 1972
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 1972

1 federal appellate · 9 state decisions

4019341940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hale v. Allinson · Kelley v. Gill · Dahlberg v. Fisse · Potts v. Wallace · Coleman v. Hagey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “So far as the corporation issuing stock is concerned, the shares of capital stock which it issues are [772] its liabilities and not its assets. Stock certificates with a stated par value, although not a direct indebtedness of the corporation, evidence the fact that the holder has paid a certain amount to the corporation which it is liable to pay back to him proportionately with other shareholders upon dissolution, out of its assets remaining after other creditors have been paid. Of course it also determines his share of earnings. . . . The shares are assets of the stockholders to whom they are issued, and their liability to pay the par value thereof are assets of the corporation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “is no longer restricted to cases of that description, and the best considered authorities put the equitable jurisdiction upon three grounds, to-wit: The need of a discovery, the complicated character of the accounts, and the existence of a fiduciary or trust relation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.