Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 335 S.C. 386 - Williams v. Williams

Williams v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2007
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Whitner v. State · Berkebile v. Outen · Culbertson v. Clemens · Mullinax v. J.M. Brown Amusement Co. · Mullinax v. J.M. Brown Amusement Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]his Court's primary function is to ascertain the intention of the legislature. ... The Court should consider not merely the language ... being construed, but the word[s] and [their] meaning in conjunction with the purpose of the whole statute and the policy of the law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.