Hendricks v. Pickens County’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
October 2006
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc. · Stephen v. Avins Construction Co. · Ham v. Mullins Lumber Co. · Grayson v. Carter Rhoad Furniture · O'Banner v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Under our Worker’s Compensation Act, a claimant may proceed under § 42-9-10 or § 42-9-20 to prove a general disability; alternatively, he or she may proceed under § 42-9-30 to prove a loss, or loss of use of, a member, organ, or part of the body for which specific awards are listed in the statute. It is well-settled that an award under the general disability statutes must be predicated upon a showing of a loss of earning capacity, whereas an award under the scheduled loss statute does not require such a showing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The appellate court's review is limited to deciding whether the commission's decision is unsupported by substantial evidence or is controlled by some error of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“On appeal from the Workers' Compensation Commission, this court may reverse where the decision is affected by an error of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.