335 So. 2d 183 - Hurley v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
October 1987
most recently cited
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Coleman v. Alabama · Carter v. Jury Commission of Greene County · 49 Ala. App. 233 - Thigpen v. State · 54 Ala. App. 254 - Hurst v. State · Mathis v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'The burden is on the defendant seeking a change of venue to show to the reasonable satisfaction of the Court that he cannot receive a fair and impartial trial. Such motion is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed on appeal in the absence of gross abuse. Moore v. State , 52 Ala. App. 179 , 290 So.2d 246 (Ala.Cr.App. 1974); Hurst v. State , 54 Ala. App. 254 , 307 So.2d 62 (Ala.Cr.App. 1974), cert. denied , 293 Ala. 548 , 307 So.2d 73 (Ala. 1975).' Hurley v. State , 335 So.2d 183 , 188 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied , 335 So.2d 188 (Ala. 1976).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.