Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 335 So. 2d 356 - Straker v. Lynch

335 So. 2d 356 - Straker v. Lynch’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 1986
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 230 So. 2d 143 - Griffis v. Hill · 336 So. 2d 566 - Garrett v. Morris Kirschman & Company, Inc. · Griffith v. State · Haddock v. Robinson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The test to be applied in determining the adequacy of a verdict is whether a jury of reasonable men could have returned that verdict. This test is simply stated but may be difficult to apply in a particular case. We are aware of the difficulties and frustrations courts experience in the search for the mythical jury of reasonable men. The appellate court must be ever alert against the temptation to substitute its "verdict" for that of the jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “On the other hand, we must not refuse to act to relieve the injustice of either a grossly inadequate or excessive verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.