Huff v. Daniels’s Empirical Analysis
1960
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
June 1978
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Sporia v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc. · Largent v. Commonwealth · Ewing-Von Allmen Dairy Co. v. Fowler's Ex'r · Nichols v. Commonwealth · Smith v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The ordinary rule is that evidence as to the manner of a person’s driving at a point some distance from the place of an accident is not admissible. Gauze v. Horn, Ky., 253 S.W.2d 606 . One exception is where the vehicle has remained under the continued observation of the witness to the point of the accident. Ewing-Von Allmen Dairy Co. v. Fowler’s Ex’r, 312 Ky. 547 , 228 S.W.2d 449 . Another exception is where the evidence is designed to show a pattern of reckless or wanton driving. Rowe v. Gibson, Ky., 309 S.W.2d 173 ; Nichols v. Commonwealth, 291 Ky. 165 , 163 S.W.2d 480 ; Largent v. Commonwealth, 265 Ky. 598 , 97 S.W.2d 538 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Tingle v. Foster
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.