Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 335 SW2D 681 - Vitt v. Baer

Vitt v. Baer’s Empirical Analysis

1960

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 1982
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 1982

10 state decisions

40196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Dallas Nat. Bank v. Dallas County · Dodd v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. · Falls Industries, Inc. v. Consolidated Chemical Industries, Inc. · Critcher v. Rudy Fick, Inc. · Shelley v. Union Oil Co. of California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “failure to so amend does not affect the result of the trial of these issues,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.