Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 335 SW3D 252 - State v. Davis

State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 2011
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 399th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Padilla v. LaFrance · Ex Parte Madding · State v. Evans · State v. Aguilera · State v. Savage

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “At a minimum, a trial court retains plenary power to modify its sentence if a motion for new trial or motion in arrest of judgment is filed within 30 days of sentencing. We hold that a trial court also retains plenary power to modify its sentence if, as in this case, the modification is made on the same day as the assessment of the initial sentence and before the court adjourns for the day. The re-sentencing must be done in the presence of the defendant, his attorney, and counsel for the state.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.