Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 335 U.S. 497 - Frazier v. United States

Frazier v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

335 U.S. 497 · 1948

Citation profile

821
cited by 821 later decisions
38
cited 38 times by the Supreme Court
31
states following
November 2023
most recently cited

498 federal appellate · 54 district · 143 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 821 later decisions (38 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2023 · most notably Batson v. Kentucky (1986), Smith v. Phillips (1982)

498 federal appellate · 54 district · 143 state decisions — followed in 31 states

2100194819501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedFrazier v. United States (from District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Lewis v. United States · Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co. · Pointer v. United States · Ballard v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 821 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an opportunity beyond the minimum requirements of fair selection to express an arbitrary preference among jurors properly selected and fully qualified to sit in judgment on his case.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “in the nature of a statutory privilege, ... (it) may be withheld altogether without impairing the constitutional guaranties of 'an impartial jury' and a fair trial.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[i]mpartiality is not a technical conception. It is a state of mind. For the ascertainment of this mental attitude of appropriate indifference, the Constitution lays down no particular tests and procedure is not chained to any ancient and artificial formula.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.