State v. Gonzalez’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “violation. State v. Thiel, 183 Wis. 2d 505, 535 , 515 N.W.2d 847 (1994). An individual violates § 948.11 if he or she, aware of the nature of the material, knowingly offers or presents for inspection to a specific minor or minors material defined as harmful to children in § 948.11(l)(b). Thiel, 183 Wis. 2d at 535 . The Thiel court and the Jury Instruction Committee thought it important and necessary to define the verb”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 349 Wis. 2d 654 - State v. Stuckey

2. “'there is a reasonable likelihood that the jury was misled and therefore applied potentially confusing instructions in an unconstitutional manner.'”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Dale R. Neumann