Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 336 F.2d 153 - Reich v. Webb

Reich v. Webb’s Empirical Analysis

336 F.2d 153 · 1964

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
November 2006
most recently cited

33 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2006 · most notably Cascade Natural Gas Corporation v. El Paso Natural Gas Co People of State of California (1967), Blake v. Pallan (1977)

33 federal appellate · 5 district · 1 state decisions

23019641970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1464 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Phelps Dodge Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board · Porter v. Warner Holding Co. · Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad · Mitchell v. Robert DeMario Jewelry, Inc. · Fahey v. Mallonee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We therefore conclude that, in view of the considerations above noted, the language in 12 U.S.C. § 1464 (d)(1) ‘or any other law’ includes common law fiduciary responsibilities which the Bank Board is empowered to enforce through appropriate court action. To hold otherwise would render the language ‘or any other law’ mere surplusage.” Reich v. Webb, 336 F.2d 153 (9th Cir. 1964).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The rule of ejusdem generis, while firmly established, is only an instrumentality for ascertaining the correct meaning of words when there is uncertainty. Ordinarily, it limits general terms which follow specific ones to matters similar to those specified; but it may not be used to defeat the obvious purpose of legislation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “common law fiduciary responsibilities ... through appropriate court action”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.