Arnold v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
336 F.2d 347 · 1964
Citation profile
56 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently August 2015 · most notably United States v. Marable (1978), United States v. Mallah (1974)
56 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Berger v. United States · Gavieres v. United States · Morgan v. Devine · Ebeling v. Morgan · Morey v. Commonwealth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he record of both proceedings ... and the findings as to identity of offenses based thereon in conjunction with the two indictments.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““The test most often cited in resolving the question of identity of offenses is: is proof of the matter set out in a second indictment admissible as evidence under the first indictment, and could a conviction have been properly sustained on such evidence? If the answer is yes, then the plea is sufficient; otherwise it is not. [Citing numerous eases] * * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.