Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 336 F.2d 397 - Springer v. Townsend

Springer v. Townsend’s Empirical Analysis

336 F.2d 397 · 1964

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently August 2021

12 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

501964197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lehigh Valley Railroad Company v. Royal Indemnity Company and Others · Oklahoma v. Texas · Molone v. Wamsley · Harrison v. Corry Pharmacy · Kunglig Jarnvagsstyrelsen Royal Administration of the Swedish State Railways v. National City Bank of New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “our scope of review is limited to determining whether a lack of jurisdiction in the approval proceeding affirmatively appears from the record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.