Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 336 F.2d 595 - Guy v. United States

Guy v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

336 F.2d 595 · 1964

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
July 1992
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently July 1992

17 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

901964197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Murdock · Lyons v. United States · United States v. Jonikas · Malone v. United States · United States v. Rainone

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “fact that certain necessary parts had been temporarily removed and hidden nearby did not convert the apparatus from a still to something else. This was a question of law for the court and the court in effect charged the jury that the temporary removal of these parts (which were found nearby) did not convert the still into something else.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “If this language [of the statute] contemplated only a still that was fully assembled for operation and at such times as it was so assembled, the operation of the statute would be intermittent. 13 "A more practical construction, and that which the Court believes to be the right one, is that a still comes within the purview of the act the moment it is once assembled and put in readiness for commencement of the distilling of spirits, and that it does not lose its status thereafter as a set-up still merely because it is dismantled in part in preparation of another run.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “was a set up still as a matter of law if all parts necessary to put the still in operation were found at the location. The”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.