Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 336 F.3d 388 - Dickerson v. Bailey

Dickerson v. Bailey’s Empirical Analysis

336 F.3d 388 · 2003

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
3
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently August 2022 · most notably Rivera v. Houston Independent School District (2003), International Truck & Engine Corp. v. Bray (2004)

16 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

190200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc. · Gibbons v. Ogden · Little v. Liquid Air Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “At a minimum such facial discrimination invokes the strictest scrutiny of any purported legitimate local purpose and of the absence of nondiscriminatory alternatives.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “(1) facially discriminate against out-of-state economic interests, or (2) regulate evenhandedly and thereby evince only an indirect burden on interstate commerce.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the threshold determination is significant if only because it establishes the constitutional standard of review.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.