Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 336 F.3d 465 - Hamid v. Ashcroft

Hamid v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis

336 F.3d 465 · 2003

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
January 2022
most recently cited

11 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently January 2022 · most notably Tamang v. Holder (2010), Jian Yun Zheng v. United States Department of Justice (2005)

11 federal appellate ·

300200320102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on LOZADA · Xu Yong Lu v. Ashcroft · Carlos Huicochea-Gomez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Angela Stroe and Marin Stroes, v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) to file an affidavit stating his agreement with former counsel with respect to the actions to be taken on appeal and what counsel did [or] did not represent to the alien in this regard; (2) to show that former counsel was informed of the allegations and was given an opportunity to respond; and (3) to state whether a complaint has been filed with appropriate disciplinary authorities regarding the allegedly ineffective representation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “carries the burden of establishing that ineffective assistance of counsel prejudiced him”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[s]ound policy reasons support compliance with the Lozada requirements,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.