Kharkhan v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis
336 F.3d 601 · 2003
Citation profile
8 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Iddir v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Teodor Tamas-Mercea v. Janet Reno and the Immigration and Naturalization Service · Iliev v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Ahmad v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Denials of discretionary relief. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no court shall have jurisdiction to review — (1) any judgment granting relief under ... [8 U.S.C. § 1229b].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dave v. Ashcroft“no court shall have jurisdiction to review . . . any judgment regarding the granting of relief under section . . . 1229b [cancellation of removal] of this title.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.