Rankin’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
9 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently August 2021
9 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. · Associated Grocers, Inc. v. Washington · Salsbury Industries v. United States · Neil v. Biggers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a modicum of prejudice to the other side.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Under federal law, such a [waiver] is an issue for the judge... and pertinent fact findings by the judge aside (which would be reviewed for clear error), our review is plenary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“If arbitration is invoked in response to a lawsuit, it must be done early on in the case so resources are not needlessly deployed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.