Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 336 F.3d 848 - Himes v. Thompson

Himes v. Thompson’s Empirical Analysis

336 F.3d 848 · 2003

Citation profile

146
cited by 146 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited

42 federal appellate · 11 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Williams v. Taylor · Teague v. Lane · Weaver v. Graham · Lockyer Attorney General of California v. Andrade · Dobbert v. Florida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 146 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “defer to the state court's determination of the federal issues unless that determination is `contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “perform an `independent review of the record' to ascertain whether the state court decision was objectively unreasonable.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.