336 F. Supp. 2d 1113 - Hull v. Barnhart’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3290 · 42 U.S.C. § 1382 (§ 1611 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1383 (§ 1631 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 423 (§ 223 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on 16105b v. Dar Reddick · Union Texas Petroleum v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma · United States v. Gonsalves · Providence Hospital of Toppenish v. Shalala
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“SI 00530.030 Why Do We Need a Warrant or Court Order? POLICY The complexities of criminal law that dictate whether or not an individual meets the definition of fugitive felon or parole or probation violator are sometimes unclear and can vary from state to state. For this reason, SSA relies on the expertise of law enforcement agencies and courts for determinations about an individual’s legal status. As long as a United States warrant or court order is active, SSA considers an individual to be “fleeing” for SSI eligibility determination purposes. This is true even if the law enforcement agency is unwilling to extradite. In an OIG referral case, the special agent responsible for the case will confirm the warrant information with the appropriate law enforcement agency and supply this information to the FO. An OIG referral case that includes the warrant number and the name, address, and phone number of the warrant issuing agency, is evidence of fugitive status. * * * Although the warrant may not specifically state that the individual is a fugitive, or that the individual is fleeing, SSA still considers the individual to meet the ineligibility criteria of the fugitive felon provisions until the warrant is resolved.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]e must give substantial deference to an agency’s interpretation of its own regulations. Our task is not to decide which among several competing interpretations best serves the regulatory purpose. Rather, the agency’s interpretation must be given controlling weight unless it is plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation* * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.