Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 336 N.C. 268 - State v. Worsley

State v. Worsley’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

82
cited by 82 later decisions
3
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 76 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 82 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably State v. Lawrence (2000), State v. Parker (1999)

4 federal appellate · 76 state decisions

340199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Payton v. New York · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Sedillo v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 82 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[ a] plain and concise factual statement in each count which, without allegations of an evidentiary nature, asserts facts supporting every element of a criminal offense and the defendant’s commission thereof with sufficient precision clearly to apprise the defendant or defendants of the conduct which is the subject of the accusation.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(a) A person is guilty of rape in the first degree if the person engages in vaginal intercourse: .... (2) With another person by force and against the will of the other person, and: a. Employs or displays a dangerous or deadly weapon or an article which the other person reasonably believes to be a dangerous or deadly weapon[.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[A]ll evidence admitted, whether competent or incompetent, must be considered in the light most favorable to the State, giving the State the benefit of every reasonable inference to be drawn from the evidence and resolving in its favor any contradictions in the evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.