336 N.J. Super. 450 - Bass v. DeVink’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
13
cited by 13 later decisions
1
states following
August 2012
most recently cited
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Winberry v. Salisbury · Velasquez v. Franz · 48 N.J. Super. 566 - Gosschalk v. Gosschalk · Gosschalk v. Gosschalk · Yancoskie v. Delaware River Port Authority
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(1) there is a first-filed action in another state, (2) both cases involve the same parties, the same claims, and the same legal issues, and (3) the plaintiff will have the opportunity for adequate relief in the prior jurisdiction.” [ Innes, supra, 391 N.J.Super. at 492 , 918 A.2d 686 (App.Div.) (quoting Bass v. DeVink, 336 N.J.Super. 450, 456 , 765 A.2d 247 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 168 N.J. 292 , 773 A.2d 1156 (2001)).]”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]pplying principles of comity, we have long adhered to the general rule that the court first acquiring jurisdiction has precedence absent special equities.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[when] a foreign action is already pending whether for one day or one year it does not make sense for New Jersey courts to plow the same row over again.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.