336 N.J. Super. 492 - Sharp v. Sharp’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
11 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 666 (§ 466 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on International Shoe Co. v. Washington · Hanson v. Denckla · Milliken v. Meyer · Shaffer v. Heitner · Kulko v. Superior Court of California in and for City and County of San Francisco
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In a proceeding to establish . . . a support order or to determine parentage, a tribunal of this State may exercise personal jurisdiction over a nonresident individual. . . if: . . . . the individual engaged in sexual intercourse in this State and the child may have been conceived by that act of inter-course. . . . [ N.J.S.A. 2A:4-30.68(f).]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[The Act,] governing the interstate establishment, modification, and enforcement of child support . . . 'provides a comprehensive framework for dealing with the jurisdictional problems at hand.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“unity and structure in each state's approach to the modification and enforcement of child support orders.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.