Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 336 N.W.2d 372 - State v. Iron Shell

State v. Iron Shell’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
1
states following
October 2015
most recently cited

34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently October 2015 · most notably State v. Smith (1999), State v. Moeller (1996)

34 state decisions

2201983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bruton v. United States · Dutton v. Evans · State v. Reiman · State v. Brammer · State v. Phipps

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Prejudice does not mean the damage to the opponent's case that results from the legitimate probative force of the evidence; rather, it refers to the unfair advantage that results from the capacity of the evidence to persuade by illegitimate means.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Although relevant, evidence may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of the issues, or misleading the jury, or by considerations of undue delay, waste of time, or needless presentation of cumulative evidence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[a]ny fact that tends to connect an accused with the commission of a crime is relevant and has probative value.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.