Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 336 S.C. 8 - State v. Tyndall

State v. Tyndall’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
1
states following
January 2015
most recently cited

39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently January 2015 · most notably State v. Fennell (2000), State v. Patterson (1999)

39 state decisions

300199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Brinegar v. United States · Beck v. State of Ohio · State v. Tucker · State v. Easler

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the transfer and reorganization of the code provisions in this act are technical ... and are not intended to be substantive”). 2 . Appellant's indictment provides: ''[Appellant] did ... commit an assault and battery upon the victim ..., constituting an unlawful act of violent injury to the person of the said victim, accompanied by circumstances of aggravation.... This offense [is] in violation of the common law of this State.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the use of a deadly weapon, the infliction of serious bodily injury, the intent to commit a felony, great disparity between the ages and physical conditions of the parties involved, ... the difference in the sexes ... [,] indecent liberties or familiarities with a female, the purposeful infliction of shame and disgrace, and resistance to lawful authority.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.